I read with concern today the news item appearing in the Stevens Point Journal about the decline in the sale of french fries in fine eateries across our nation. If the quotes attributed to the spokesbeings for your respective chains are accurate, this decline has had a significant negative affect on your revenues.
Is this true? Have sales of fried potatoes really plummeted over 10% from last year? This appears to be a crisis at a time in our nation's history that requires strong, decisive action to preserve our economy. And it appears this decline is your own fault:
McDonald's, Burger King and Wendy's, all watching fry sales decline, helped bring this upon themselves - and the food industry. With entree salad sales rocketing and burger sales dropping, french fry sales have hit the skids.
"For every burger not sold, there's a bag of fries not sold," said Harry Balzer, who oversaw NPD's study.
You've also failed to factor in significant changes that have been taking place right under your very noses:
* Healthier eating habits. Concerns about obesity have nudged consumers away from many fried foods. A large McDonald's fries has 540 calories. Some consumers also are put off by the artery-clogging trans-fatty acids in most french fry oils. McDonald's has delayed previously announced plans to remove trans fat from its frying oil.
* Value menu mania. The "perceived value" of two burgers for $2 beats a burger, fries and drink combo, Lombardi said.
* Salad mania. Entree salad sales are hot, and few salad eaters order fries as a side.
* Cancer concerns. Some recent studies have linked fries with a potentially cancer-causing chemical called acrylamide.
* Aging baby boomers. Many feel more content with soup and salad at Panera Bread than a fast-food burger and fries.
* Fried is so 2002. Popularity for non-fried food is growing. Subway has no fryers - and more U.S. stores than McDonald's.
(emphasis mine)
It's bad enough that your lax management has allowed this to happen to your own revenues, but do you understand how this affects the independent potato farmers? These noble tillers of the earth toil in the soil to serve as the very foundation of the nation itself - and you people are letting them down.
It may be too late to readjust your marketing and product paradigms to recover the revenues in the short term, and for that you will surely suffer the wrath of your stockholders.
But take heart and follow the bold trail blazed by the Music Industry. They too sat idly by while their market dynamics changed drastically - fiddled (pun intended) while it burned, so to speak. Their revenues dropped, their shareholders wrathed and their CEOs, COOs and CFOs had no choice but to consult their attorneys.
The solution? If you can't get your market to go out and buy your stuff voluntarily, get your jackbooted, thug lawyers on it and get the money by SUING 'em for it! It's working like a charm for the RIAA - they even settled out of court for two large with a twelve-year old little girl - after scaring the living doody out of her with a lawsuit!
This could really catch on and help just about every troubled industry - at least until the political backlash hits or the jackbooted, thug lawyers suck all the money out of every man, woman and child in Consumerland, whichever comes first.
Firestone should sue all the people that dissed their Wilderness AT tires that had such an unfair reputation for blowing out and inconveniencing unreasonably demanding car owners.
AOL should sue all the people that dropped them like hot potatoes (sorry about the pun there, guys) for broadband web access when all those trillions of unused free hours were still in the "FREE-TAKE ONE" bins at Wal-sMarts, office supply houses, music shops and Circle K's.
The Tobacco Industry should mount a cooperative effort with several of the several states and municipalities that have enacted punitive tobacco taxes to fund children's health, education and welfare initiatives to recover sales lost to effective smoking cessation clinics and Indian Nation Reservation sales.
Nope, you can't just sit there hoping consumers will snap out of it and revert to their old ways - you'll have to grab them by the ankles, turn them upside down and shake them loose from your money...
...legally, in court, with a suitable percentage going to the aforementioned jackbooted, thug lawyers.
You wouldn't want them to sue their market, would you?
Recent Comments